Cañon City Council approves rezoning of proposed municipalities from Cañon City to Abbey – Canon City Daily Record
Another step was taken on Monday for the CaÃ±on City Commons project at the abbey.
CaÃ±on City Council unanimously approved the first reading of a rezoning ordinance to allow for the proposed development.
The applicant, Walter T. Kosch of Sonnenschein Financial Services, LLC, is seeking to rezone the 187-acre Abbey property into a planned development district, in which the Abbey property will have its own personalized set of written planning regulations and a map to show. how these regulations apply to interior development areas.
The intention is to create a mixed-use plan that incorporates various types of residential spaces, open spaces / parks / recreation, offices, retail, hotels and event centers.
The property is owned by CV 11 CaÃ±on City LLC.
The Planning Commission unanimously supports the application for the CaÃ±on City municipalities project to the abbey
The planning committee voted unanimously to recommend that city council approve the rezoning request at a meeting on October 27. A dozen residents spoke at this public hearing, offering alternative ideas for the property and expressing concerns about the potential impacts on traffic, roads, storm water, water, sewers and even schools. .
On Monday, council heard from nine community members who also expressed concerns about traffic, stormwater and soil. Some residents have asked that council not allow this rural community to start having an urban feel.
âWe have to be very careful when looking to develop our region so that we don’t make the mistakes other places have made,â said Beth Katchmar, owner of a local business. âI think we all really appreciate our rural areas and the reason we moved here – for our open spaces. I think the abbey will be developed, but I think we have to be very careful about how we develop it. “
Councilor Amy Schmisseur also raised concerns about the lot sizes for subdivision homes and other single-family homes, which are smaller than what council considered in the city’s unified development code while reviewing the residential zoning areas.
âThis kind of density really worries me,â she said. “I think it’s a lot denser than what we are looking or considering or had thought of in the rest of CaÃ±on City.”
Project representative Rob Brown said the density shown on the plan is maximum density and this pocket neighborhood will be added as the project develops over the next several decades. Each will include a park, dog park and / or playground as well as connections to trails.
âWe intend to continue existing operations,â said Brown. âEverything that happens at the abbey is very important for our community. They provide jobs and services that would otherwise be non-existent there. “
Additionally, there will be a continuous view of the monastery from US 50, Brown said, and the entire front of the property will be a commercial garden.
The developers will also maintain the zoning of a future recreation center.
âWe think the recreation center is always an interesting part of the project and the community,â said Brown. âWe have authorized either a public installation or a private installation. We will be working with the local community to look at some private options. “
After hearing comments from the public, board member Dolly Gonzales said the Abbey property had been for sale for 35 years.
âWhat I feel, as a board member, is who am I to get that out of what a developer wants,â she said. âI have a large open space behind my house right now, and I don’t have a say in what goes on there. If anyone wants to come and buy the property and build on it, I have nothing to say – I can move out, I can do whatever I need to do.
Her feelings were echoed by board member Mandy Reed. She said she would hate to see the property fall into a serious state of disrepair as Sainte-Scholastique has done for many years.
âWe have a developer who is willing to take a chance on us,â she said. âI can’t imagine as a business owner trying to sell my business for 35 years and nobody wants it. Basically I think the government shouldn’t hinder private enterprise.
She said there will be further public hearings and opportunities to provide comment as development progresses.
âI just encourage you to think that if this was your land or your house and you tried to sell it, how would you feel if we were here making this decision for you,â he said. she declared.